PRWeb Podcasting (A.K.A. Sales Puke-Cast)

PRWeb is putting out a service that is basically a softball, PR interview with submitted-press-release inspired questions for people who do a certain level of press release distribution with them.

Podcasting is supposed to be a conversation – unique, compelling content that happens on an ongoing basis. These are one-off 5-7 minute advertisements, and I can’t imagine would create a relationship with customers since they don’t provide value. This example is not about giving value, it’s about a one-shot ad with PRWeb.

Let me give you an example of the intro of one doozy, which is the first bit of voice at the beginning.

“The MSX classic is manufactured by one of the worlds leading faucet manufacturing companies, and features chrome and brass surfaces, ceramic valves, and state-of-the-art protective finishes. Nothing but the best.”

Gag. It’s a 5-7 minute radio infomercial ad.

It goes on to talk about “easy cleaning” and “motorcycle inspired.” The whole thing is an ad that give me no value whatsoever. Also, there is no emotional connection (which is a major benefit to podcasting) between the company and the listener.

PRWeb doesn’t get it. Of course, it’s a business opportunity. It makes them look cool to the majority of marketers who do not have a clue what Web 2.0, podcasting, or blogging actually is.

And it doesn’t make them any money to put the thought into creating a campaign, the man hours, for each individual client, it’s a factory model – it’s making a podcast a “check mark” on the list and just getting it done instead of getting it done right.

I am a fan of Jeffrey Gitomer and his philosophy of giving value to get value – and NO ONE wants to sold, but they love to buy.

This is sales puke to me. It’s one thing if it’s a sponsor and all I had was an ad, but why would I subject myself to 5-7 minutes of some PR person spewing on me why they’re the greatest?

Other issues include the cover art being PRWeb-branded, not subject branded, as well a the media player on the site requiring the entire podcast episode to be loaded and so it does not play immediately, and you cannot easily “drag and scan” through the podcast.
It’s the infomercial radio approach dropped on a “podcasting” framework – and another large company wanting to be on the “bandwagon” with a top-down approach to the medium.

Not to mention, the entire podcast, both host and subject, being on the phone is just grating.

p.s. – I do give them credit for using Ogg Vorbis. Few use the format right now, but it’s open source and that’s a good thing.

It’s Podcast. Not Pod-cast or Pod cast.

Mini-rants and tip for all the folks trying to be hip and in with Web 2.0…

It’s Podcast.  Not Pod-Cast or Pod Cast.  Podcast, for better or worse, with Zune putting it on the main menu with it’s now revision, will be the word that is used for the medium of audio and/or video provided on demand and by subscription.  If those two agree, then that’s what it is.  I’m surprised, but that’s how it’s shaken out.
If you write Pod Cast, Pod-Cast, Pod-casting, or any other incorrect form of the term you automatically will be perceived as not knowing what you are talking about.  So just don’t do it.

27 Million Give Podcasting A Chance

27 million people. Now we’re getting somewhere.

However, we need to make sure we do a better marketing job as media professionals as to what podcasting is. There’s big confusion out there, and people answered the question only after having a definition read to them.

There are lots of people who maybe aren’t technophiles but would really enjoy them, and we need to reach out to them, instead of what some do, which is belittlement. A simple google search comes up with these folks standing on some ground of techno-superiority.

I see three major talking points:

Some of the confusion comes from the word itself, because it infers you need an iPod (when you do not, if you do it right any mp3-compatible player will do, or even just your computer and some speakers attached to it). It’s the most common explanation I give, almost on a daily basis.

We can’t abandon the word “podcasting”; after all, it’s something like 80% of the mp3 player market is iPods, it’s a rare instance where the best designed and engineered consumer product is winning, and there’s some good press mileage.

Another improvement that could be made, is that as much as it does make some sense, “subscribe” on the iTunes music store infers to some that people need to pay for it. I’ve seen lots of intelligent people get foiled by that. We must take the attitude (as somethings as painful as it may be) that wording can be confusing and be mindful of it.

Lastly, we need to try to stay away from DRM (Digital Rights Management). It restricts people, and the reality is that people want what they want, where they want it, when they want it. We must face the fact that if someone truly wants to steal content, no DRM will stop them.

We can do things like only offer the direct podcast link on a subscription page, etc. but when you start reaching into peoples’ computers, forcing them to listen while they’re online or limiting where/when they can use it, you hinder your effectiveness (think AOL video… much of it you can’t use it if you have a mac, eliminating a strong early adopter audience). I don’t necessarily blame AOL completely, as some of their top people like Ted Leonsis mostly “get it,” but the development of this medium, and it’s profit potential, will be limited as long as there is the bent toward controlling users).

Perception IS reality. Let’s improve the perception of podcasting by making it easier to use; by not going on tirades to the effect of “it’s not a podcast if you don’t subscribe!” The rest of the non-tech world does not care. They want it to work the best way it can into their life.

And, as we show people how to take what they want with them wherever they go, we’ll get more to subscribe soon enough.