The Obligatory Old Spice Post

Everyone and their brother (and sister) has weighed in one way or another on this Old Spice campaign. If you don’t know what it is, for my non-marketing community members, here’s a snippet below (my personal favorite, a funny note to his daughter).

So here’s the deal. The creative did capture attention. But there’s been a lot of debate on whether it has been successful. Some reports say a 7% drop, others say a 107% increase. There are various other bits I’ve seen all over the web, with everyone getting up some post on how brilliant or flawed the engagement was, or whatever one of thousands dissected viewpoints to get a few more eyeballs to their blog.

Here’s the reality. They’re almost all full of it.

Because we really don’t know (yet) how effective it is. It is too early.

Sure, there’s some numbers released – but until we get 60, 90, 120 days out – we don’t know what the impact is and anyone who says otherwise is participating in punditry, not reporting, and although fun, not that useful for actionable decisions for the rest of us who are interested in making money for our clients.

Politics Isn’t Just For Elections

A lot of this politics. Much like if you go to sites like the Michigan Truth Squad for politics, you find every candidate has a spin and an agenda, stretching the truth to fit that aim. Same here, with so many dollars at stake amongst the ad and media business. Social media focused folks heaped unbridled praise. Those who are skeptical look for every hole possible. This has turned more into intrigue than science. Of course, that intrigue is more impressions of Old Spice, so from their perspective, it may or may not be a bad thing.

But as professionals, we’re supposed to measure and actually find out what the real response is. Did it move more product? I think there’s not enough of that thought. For actionable data, we’ve gotta be patient instead of trying to fill RSS readers and Twitter streams with half-cocked information. And then when we get that info, look for the real trends as opposed to what we want to see. So as hard as it is to pull away from the gossip for some, it’s probably best, if you want to use this experience to improve yourself, to have a little patience and wait till there are solid results and then make some decisions.

And then take that lesson with you to future endeavors, too.

Conversate: The Value Equation

This week you’re a fly on the wall of a conversation around the value equation. Startup Weekend Detroit has just passed, and there were some good speakers there that drove home the point of value.

What is it that you do that others value? What makes you special? Time for a little business soul searching and hopefully some useful advice. After all, you’re in business to make money.

Joining Dave and I this week is Therran Oliphant, who is the main man behind Hand Raiser marketing.

[Download MP3] [Subscribe in iTunes]

Cold Calling Has Gone.. Cold

Every time a prognosticator predicts the death of a business practice, my skin crawls. Few things in business rarely die out, they merely become less effective. For example, if you listen to the mainstream media gurus the newspaper industry should have imploded by now. Certainly it is not a healthy industry, yet it is a resilient industry that is learning on the fly how to remain relevant and profitable in a digital media age.

So I will not be predicting the death of the cold call, however I believe it will soon be on life support. Some sales people claim to enjoy cold calling and will feel naked without it in their tool belt. Some companies have thrived by smilin’ and dialin’, so they will resist any change to their core business. There will always be one-call close sales environments and that will always encourage one-call close prospecting techniques. For these reasons, cold calling will not die. It will merely go the way of the horse and buggy. People still wax poetically about how great life was when this was our primary means of transportation until they actually ride in one

My prediction is based on these three factors:

  1. The cost of customer acquisition by cold calling
  2. The adoption of Do-Not-Call lists
  3. The growing popularity of social media outlets

Factor #1: The Cost of Customer Acquisition by Cold Calling

The internet marketing firm Hubspot released their report The State of Inbound Marketing 2010 this past February and it should be an eye opener for those who cling to their old prospecting measures. On page four of the report, respondents who relied on outbound lead generation (call centers, etc.) stated that their average cost per lead was $332. This compares to the $134 per lead paid by the firms who rely on inbound lead generation.

Factor #2: The Adoption of Do-Not-Call Lists

Do-Not-Call lists have been adopted in much of the industrialized world. In the US, the list only applies to individual consumers, allowing businesses to call other businesses with little regulation. For every phone number in the United States, the Federal Trade Commission claims that approximately 30 percent of those numbers are registered with the on the federal call list. This leaves almost one-third of the potential calling universe off your prospect list.

Costs have risen quickly because of this list. Calls must be scrubbed against the list to ensure calls are not made to consumers on the registry. Transgressions can cost up to $10,000 per occurrence with no limit. Just ask Direct TV ($5.3 million fine), Craftmatic Industries ($4.4 million) and ADT Security Services ($2 million) how these fines can impact your bottom line. The fines also trickle down to the individual telemarketer and can cost the individual more than they earn in a year.

Factor #3: The Growing Popularity of Social Media Outlets

On The Nielson Company blog, it indicates that there were over 124 million unique visitors to social media websites in December of 2010. Both Facebook and Twitter have more than doubled their unique users in the past year. This is much faster than the growth rate of things that are now omnipresent, like telephones, televisions and the internet. Very quickly, Americans are drifting away from talking on the phone to communicating online. It is now easy to talk through the internet with your family and friends while ignoring the pleas of the cold caller.

People want a different experience from companies. They want to engage with you or with your company directly. They will ask extended friends for advice. They will not pick up your unsolicited phone call. They will not return your cleverly crafted voicemail message. They will call you when they are ready. When they reach out to you, will they get a busy signal because you are trying to cold call? Or will they hear a friendly voice that they trust because you have already interacted with them on their terms? The choice is yours.

Why Millions Will Buy Toaster Computers

There have been fast and furious rumors around a “Mac App Store” for the flagship OSX platform. I’ll get this right out of the way now: I personally do not like totally closed systems. Although Steve Jobs left a cryptic “nope” to an email question about the subject, it’s entirely possible a mac app store IS coming, just not one that locks down the platform completely.

A Mac App Store doesn’t have to lock it down to change computing anyway, and I think it would at least double the Apple computer share of the market.

Although controls will be in that store, like the current iTunes/iPhone/iPad store, I think it’ll be a boon for developers, especially the small ones who happen to get instant visibility.

As much as I don’t like the notion of control, I realize it’s a veritable money machine. Steve Jobs is making computing like using a toaster: you put in the bread, hit a button, and voila, toast of your choice at one of predetermined temperature settings (because Steve knows the settings that MOST people like their toast at).

Why? Because to most people, these things we call “computers” are just tools. Every day I deal with people who call blog posts “articles.” Or even don’t know that what they’re reading is a blog. The average computer user doesn’t care about what us power users do.

Sure, there’s people like me, who need to make the bread that goes in the toaster. You can’t use a toaster to make the bread itself; so there will always be the need for the high-power platform. The app developers, too, make bread, so they need the power too. But there will be a day that most people are using computers that have a much more controlled environment than others and enjoy it because of their lack of perceived security woes, and when they turn it on, it just runs. Because they want to make toast.

I’ve had multiple friends switch to the mac based on sheer boot time alone. I turn on my mac, and it goes; their off-the-shelf PCs are taking minutes and I’m up in one or less. That “feature” alone I’ve witnessed first hand alone has motivated hundreds of dollars of premium dollars going to Apple.

Why will this work? Because with their mobile devices, Apple has found that people like not having to think about using the tool. As a person I highly respect, Merlin Mann of 43folders says in relation to optimal tools to get something done, “it’s just a cup.” One of his illustrations of achieving the true zen of productivity is not thinking about which cup you’re going to put your morning coffee in; you just grab your cup and use it to drink coffee. That’s the “pain point” non-enthusiasts have with computers. People are too busy worrying about their cup (the ins and outs of running the computer), and it gets in the way of drinking coffee (getting work done).

Whoever reduces computing to Merlins’ definition of a cup, wins.

And if you can make your product or service that toaster or cup in your space, you’ll win too.

The Demise Of The Free Web

Ning now is requiring that you pay for their services to have a Ning social network, and laid off 40% of their staff.

Recently, I blogged about the pricing structure changing for Sprout to something much above what people that were their high-numbers base could pay (I didn’t like how they handled the transition, but I understood why).

And there’s more cases. Things like Twitter adding ads to search; our data being culled by Facebook and shared around to advertisers and app makers like a kindergarten cold.

If you’re not paying with your dollars, you’re paying dearly with your data. Or at times, both.

The reality is that we’re hitting another bubble in that not everything can be free and the preponderance of the evidence so far says that the future is full of paid services, because although the bits are cheap, people are not.

Supporting free users, and even cheap bits when you’re not receiving enough money for them gets really expensive.. really fast. Match that with the demands of investors who literally want 10x return on the money they’ve put in, and you’ve got a recipe for a change in how the web functions.

Patrick Norton, part of the Revision 3 network and former TechTV host, made a point on a podcast awhile back: there’s going to be a point where these folks need to be real businesses. And I believe we’re at that point.

The days of “build it and they will come” may still be here, but that doesn’t guarantee there’s even enough money for a job for you. The challenge of the web is now “what service can you provide that people are actually willing to pay you for?”

Watch this video – an oldie but goodie from the folks at 37signals. “It’s a revolutionary thought. It’s too simple to work. Have a price!” It’s two years later, they’re hiring, they’re growing. And making profit. With relatively little outside investment.